Kim Kardashian Bowls in Louboutins
posted by: Shomore in Celebrity Shoe Style on October 12th, 2010
I’ve sacrificed comfort and functionality in the name of fashion before, but this image of Kim Kardashian bowling / hosting the opening of High Rollers Luxury Lane in Louboutins is just plain ridiculous. Sure, Kim’s doing this to get press for the event (job done!), but aren’t there other more stylish and sensible shoes you can wear so that you don’t risk a tumble?
What would you do if you were hosting an event and were getting paid big bucks? Go for the glamorous look in stilettos or tone it down a bit in wedges or even cute, trendy oxfords?
7 Comments
- Click Here to Speak Up
May 13, 2011 at 7:34 am, Sophia said:
God! Are you guys jealous or what? Is it that bad that she is wearing those shoes? If she would've fell.. yeah ok! But she didn't, so.. Let her be!
October 19, 2010 at 2:14 pm, RPM said:
Photo op wise… She made it work and drew attention. Much show off points. I highly doubt she canbowl a game in it’s entirety like that. But if she can, impressive. That said. It’s totally ridiculous and I’ll advised.
But at the end of it all, she further pushed her brand. Over the top at all cost. Sadly, some poor fan will try and duplicate it and risk injury.
For the photo op…I love it. But only for that.
October 18, 2010 at 9:17 pm, Jacqui said:
Being fashionable involves knowing when an outfit is inappropriate. I would have gone bowling shoes so I didn't look like a complete tit. Stylista – yeah I can't figure it out either. Sure, she's attractive but her wardrobe is less than desirable.
October 13, 2010 at 10:25 pm, Kim Kardashian al bowling in Loubie | Very Cool! said:
[...] Via Shoeblog [...]
October 13, 2010 at 7:43 pm, Bronwyn said:
Um – don't bowling places make you wear bowling shoes?
October 14, 2010 at 4:39 pm, Stylista said:
Not if your rich and famous.
October 13, 2010 at 4:23 pm, Stylista said:
I really don't think Kim deserves all of this attention from the fashion world…really, what has she done that's worth it? But, that's just what I think. She definitely could have worn more practical, yet fashionable shoes. It's possible to look good, even without Louboutins!