NYT on the Paris Fashion Week Killer Shoes
Posted on October 11th, 2007 by shoesense under Fashion Week, High heels, Shoe Trends, Walking DisastersI found myself nodding vigorously several times while reading Eric Wilson’s article in NYT, so I have to quote a good chunk of it here:
The appearance of so many shoes that were either ingenious, architecturally marvelous or potentially murderous gives credence to what some designers have predicted is a fashion movement away from the It bag, since there are now so many self-proclaimed It bags that no one can really keep track of what It is any longer.
So now comes the It shoe, more insider-y, more daring for consumers to pull off. And Paris offered some of the most breathtaking (as in, how would you ever wear them) examples of the season. At Chloé, the heels were inverted triangles, ending in a sharp point, as if the wearer were standing on a shark’s tooth. At Nina Ricci, heels curved inward like thick bear claws.
Riccardo Tisci of Givenchy offered gladiator styles that laced to the knees, in sandal and stiletto variations. Alexander McQueen included a pagoda shoe in his show that elicited applause for the model who wore them without falling; and Antonio Berardi showed a high heel on an elongated platform at the toe that actually had no heel (a style similar to ones Marc Jacobs did for his New York show).
“When you walk, it is almost on tiptoe,” Mr. Berardi said. “You look really dainty.”
Dainty? Perhaps dainty like a faun.
Yep.
- Jil Sander Reverse Heel
- Paris Fashion Week Spring 2009: Heel Detail Wrapup
- The Science of High Heels: h=Q x (12 + 3s/8)
- April Fools’ Day Shoes
- Rihanna’s Shoe Stye
- Shoe History Corner: Roger Vivier and the Stiletto



Piperlime
October 12th, 2007 at 9:15 am
Ah, but the difference between the Marc Jacobs and the Antonio Berardi is HUGE – the Berardi is a light, airy celebration of what clever application of the laws of physics can do for a shoe, while the Jacobs is just turning a heel sideways, as any small child might think of.
October 13th, 2007 at 2:26 pm
ah, a shoe only a man would create! lol
January 7th, 2008 at 10:33 am
[...] talked a bit about the heel-less shoe phenomenon that never seems to die completely. This Manolo, in [...]
February 23rd, 2008 at 9:57 pm
Does anyone know how much is it? or which website sells it?
April 9th, 2008 at 11:01 am
1800 pounds in london
April 9th, 2008 at 6:27 pm
Holy @#$%! 1800 pounds=$3,600!
May 10th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
what is that ?
July 1st, 2008 at 3:34 am
How the hell do you walk in those!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!??????????
August 23rd, 2008 at 7:26 am
[...] I think the picture says it all, but there’s some interesting tidbits after the link: NYT on the Paris Fashion Week Killer Shoes Heelless heels This entry was posted on Saturday, August 23rd, 2008 at 6:26 am and is filed under [...]
August 23rd, 2008 at 3:22 pm
[...] provides just enough support for the heel… just don’t wear these shoes for too long: More info. __________________ [...]
October 5th, 2008 at 5:19 pm
didn’t victoria beckham wear some shoes like these? except they were boots right?
December 20th, 2008 at 2:30 pm
Those shoes are sooooo cool!!!!! The only thing is I don’t know if I could walk in them. I would go to put wieght on my heels and fall on my butt! OUCH! and on top of that be embarressed-_-
January 14th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
4000 libras in venice.
February 4th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
these shoes look painful
May 20th, 2009 at 7:37 am
beautiful shoes; beautiful feet
i wish my friends, colleagues, and neighbors would wear shoes like these
February 11th, 2010 at 10:36 pm
Some of those toes look a bit squished, too, which just adds to the general discomfort-OW look of these.